Delhi faces hazardous pollution levels, with Air Quality Index (AQI) readings often soaring above 400—categorized as ‘severe’. Vehicular emissions contribute nearly 50% of PM2.5 and 80% of NOx emissions in the city, prompting renewed scrutiny of outdated vehicles. The latest government proposal—to deny fuel to vehicles older than 10–15 years—aims to curb emissions from these high-polluting sources, which account for around 28% of PM2.5 alone.
Although the proposal has been put on hold, can such targeted bans deliver real impact? This article explores whether phasing out “End-of-Life” vehicles is a viable long-term solution—or a partial fix to Delhi’s complex and deep-rooted pollution crisis.
Every year, Delhi grapples with a severe pollution crisis, especially between October and December. This recurring problem is driven by multiple factors, including stubble burning in neighboring states, waste-to-energy (WTE) incinerators, and seasonal weather patterns that trap pollutants, pollution from festive celebrations like Diwali and New Year, and the continued use of outdated vehicles.
In response, the former Delhi government implemented measures such as the Odd-Even rule, which restricted vehicles on alternate days based on their registration numbers. However, this initiative yielded a limited impact and failed to bring meaningful relief to the citizens.
With a new government in place, fresh strategies are being tested—ranging from experimental artificial rainfall to a recent, controversial proposal: banning fuel for vehicles older than 10 to 15 years. Yet, a critical question remains—can such steps truly address the deeply rooted issue of air pollution?
While this latest measure has been temporarily put on hold due to strong public backlash, it raises an important debate. Could phasing out “old” or “End-of-Life” vehicles make a dent in Delhi’s pollution levels? Let’s explore whether this approach offers a viable long-term solution or merely scratches the surface of a far more complex challenge.
Under the Automotive Industry Standard-129 (AIS), an “end-of-life” vehicle refers to one that:
Fuel stations are now equipped with ANPR cameras to automatically detect these vehicles in real-time. Once identified, these vehicles can be denied fuel, fined, and impounded.
While older vehicles do emit a disproportionately high share of pollutants—contributing around 28% of PM2.5 and 41% of Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) emissions, they represent only a subset of the overall pollution problem in the National Capital Region (NCR). In total, vehicles of all types and ages are responsible for nearly 50% of PM2.5 and 80% of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions.
Previous interventions, such as Delhi’s odd-even vehicle rationing scheme, offered only temporary relief—resulting in a 10-13% reduction in PM2.5 levels—before pollution levels rebounded. This was largely because other major sources, like construction, industrial emissions, and crop burning, remained unaddressed. Additionally, traffic patterns quickly adapted to the new rules, further reducing the scheme’s effectiveness.
Importantly, targeting vehicles based solely on age can be misleading. Older vehicles that are well-maintained or retrofitted may emit less pollution than newer ones that are poorly maintained. A blanket ban fails to consider this variation in actual emissions performance.
The current policy also risks disproportionately affecting lower-income residents, who are more likely to rely on older vehicles. Without affordable alternatives or a robust public transportation network, such measures may deepen social inequities while achieving limited environmental benefit. While Delhi’s air quality plans include laudable goals—such as electrifying public transport and promoting non-motorized mobility, these require sustained investment, infrastructure upgrades, and coordination with surrounding states.
Experts argue that a more effective strategy must include stricter inspection and maintenance regimes, faster adoption of cleaner fuels and technologies, rigorous enforcement of industrial and construction emissions standards, and most critically, regional collaboration to tackle crop residue burning.
Moreover, can banning 10–15-year-old vehicles in Delhi alone effectively address the city’s pollution crisis? Experts argue that simply relocating these vehicles to other states only shifts the problem rather than solving it. If scrapping older vehicles is the only viable solution, the next big question is: what impact will this have on the average citizen’s wallet?
The ban on 10- and 15-year-old diesel and petrol vehicles in Delhi, combined with the vehicle scrappage policy, is causing considerable disruption for consumers, especially those from low- and middle-income groups. Many small traders, taxi drivers, and daily commuters depend on older vehicles for their livelihood, and the sudden enforcement of the “end of life” rule has rendered their assets virtually worthless overnight.
Although the government offers benefits like a 4-6% rebate on new vehicle purchases, up to 25% road tax concession, and waiver of registration fees, the upfront cost of buying a new vehicle remains prohibitive for many. According to the policy, private vehicles will need fitness tests after 15 years (8 years for commercial vehicles), and failing these tests means mandatory scrapping. However, critics argue that many older vehicles, especially those maintained well and compliant with emission norms, are being arbitrarily removed from the roads.
Furthermore, loopholes in implementation allow vehicles to be sold in other states, simply shifting the pollution problem instead of solving it. In the absence of a robust and transparent scrappage ecosystem, India is witnessing the rise of vehicle graveyards—large, unregulated clusters of discarded vehicles. As Delhi residents face policy uncertainty and financial strain, the broader question remains: can a one-size-fits-all approach delivers environmental progress without deepening social inequities?
While scrapping old vehicles may not be financially viable for many consumers in the short term, it offers several long-term benefits, such as:
The bottom line is that tackling Delhi’s pollution crisis requires more than symbolic gestures—it demands a holistic, data-driven, and socially inclusive approach. While phasing out end-of-life vehicles may offer certain environmental and economic benefits, it cannot serve as a standalone solution. Without addressing industrial emissions, crop burning, construction dust, and inadequate public transport, the impact of such targeted bans will remain marginal.
For any policy to succeed, it must balance ecological goals with economic realities, ensuring that solutions are equitable, enforceable, and part of a broader regional strategy. Only then can Delhi hope to breathe cleaner air—not just seasonally, but sustainably.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Stay ahead in the dynamic world of trade and commerce with India Business & Trade's weekly newsletter.