For years, India’s UPI has been celebrated as a global fintech marvel. From street-side chai stalls to roadside fruit carts, even the smallest vendors were proudly displaying QR codes showing how deeply digital payments had penetrated daily life. Foreign delegates praised it, tech leaders studied it, and citizens embraced the ease of tapping a phone instead of fumbling for change.
But lately, that seamless system has hit a bump. In cities like Bengaluru, handwritten signs that read “No UPI, only cash” are quietly replacing those QR codes. What happened to the digital dream? As it turns out, the very system that made life easier might now be causing fear — especially among small traders.
Image credit: Freepik
In India’s digital growth story, UPI (Unified Payments Interface) has been the undisputed hero. Launched in 2016 and turbo-charged during the COVID-19 pandemic, UPI transformed how the country paid, especially at the grassroots. From chaiwalas to fruit sellers, QR codes became a daily part of business. They made transactions faster, reduced the hassle of handling change, and built customer trust in a world that had suddenly gone contactless.
By 2023, India was recording over 10 billion UPI transactions a month, a figure that symbolised the country’s leap into digital inclusion. But in a surprising twist, small traders in cities like Bengaluru are now pulling back. Handwritten signs that say “Cash Only” are replacing QR codes. The very system that once promised ease is now being viewed with fear — and the reason has a lot to do with GST panic.
The spark came when small vendors started receiving unexpected notices from tax authorities. These notices cited massive amounts — sometimes in the tens of lakhs calculated on the basis of UPI inflows into their accounts.
To authorities, large digital transactions suggested high business turnover. But for many of these traders, that wasn’t the reality. UPI receipts weren’t always sales. They included personal transfers, rent payments, help from family members, and exempt sales like fresh produce. Yet, without formal books or separate business accounts, vendors couldn’t easily prove what was what.
A street vendor in Bengaluru, who makes around ₹3,000 a day selling flowers, had been accepting UPI for years. But after receiving a GST notice suggesting she had crossed the registration threshold, she took down her QR code. Others followed. For them, digital had suddenly become dangerous.
During the pandemic, UPI wasn’t just convenient — it was essential. Social distancing rules and hygiene fears discouraged cash handling. QR codes became the safest way to buy and sell. Many vendors, including those who never dealt with formal banking before, learned to use digital wallets and payment apps because customers demanded it.
Ironically, it was this enthusiastic adoption — without parallel financial education — that set them up for today’s crisis. They embraced technology, but the system didn’t support them with adequate clarity on compliance or tax implications. Now, that trust is being broken.
The GST registration threshold is ₹40 lakh in annual turnover for most small businesses. But UPI inflows alone aren’t a reliable indicator of business volume. In many cases, authorities reportedly used data from payment apps and banks without context or categorisation.
Small vendors typically don’t maintain detailed accounts, nor do they have professional help. Many don’t even realise they’ve triggered a red flag. By the time a notice arrives, the panic has already set in.
State authorities have clarified that these notices are “only for verification” and not tax demands. Karnataka’s commercial tax department has even launched awareness campaigns to calm the situation. But the fear remains — because once a system is seen as punitive, trust is hard to rebuild.
This backlash isn’t just about tax. It reflects a deeper challenge in India’s push toward digital governance: the gap between policy and lived experience.
Small vendors were never against formalisation. They simply weren’t prepared for the complexity that came with it. They used UPI because it was marketed as easy. But when that ease turns into anxiety — with risks of legal notices and financial scrutiny — it’s natural they return to what feels safer: cash.
The real danger? This sentiment could spread. If more traders across India start feeling that digital payments expose them to government scrutiny or unexpected tax burdens, UPI adoption may suffer long-term damage.
To restore confidence, three things must happen.
Clear Communication: Authorities must clarify how UPI inflows are assessed and reassure small traders that personal transfers or exempt sales won’t be penalised unfairly.
Financial Literacy: Just like UPI onboarding drives, there must be easy-to-understand awareness campaigns around GST rules, digital recordkeeping, and compliance basics — especially for micro-enterprises.
Policy Sensitivity: Rules should reflect real-world complexity. A chaiwala and a chain café operate very differently. Blanket assessments based on raw data don’t work in an informal economy.
There’s no doubt that UPI has changed the way India pays. From chaiwalas to premium stores, the world took notice of digital payments. It was fast, easy, and for a while, felt like everyone had a QR code within arm’s reach.
But what we’re seeing now isn’t a rejection of digital progress but it’s hesitation that question deserves an honest answer. When innovation moves faster than understanding, confusion grows. When compliance feels unclear, fear steps in. The UPI story isn’t broken but the trust that made it possible needs attention.
If India wants to keep leading the world in digital inclusion, it must make sure that no one feels left behind or blindsided by rules they didn’t even know applied. After all, the real strength of any system lies not just in how many people use it — but in how confidently they do.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Stay ahead in the dynamic world of trade and commerce with India Business & Trade's weekly newsletter.