India’s proposed GST 2.0 reforms seek to streamline the indirect tax system by merging slabs, lowering rates on consumer goods, and simplifying compliance. The reforms are expected to spur consumption, ease inflationary pressures, and strengthen India’s global competitiveness.
Yet, consensus remains challenging due to the federal nature of GST, with states relying heavily on revenues from the 18% slab and wary of fiscal shortfalls. Sectoral resistance and transitional hurdles like system upgrades and stock relabelling add to the complexity. While the vision is a simpler, growth-driven GST regime, its rollout hinges on negotiations, clear compensation mechanisms, and phased implementation.
GST 2.0 reforms, aimed at simplifying India’s tax system through a two-tier structure and lower rates on essential goods, are projected to cause an annual revenue loss of Rs 85,000 crore but simultaneously boost consumption by Rs 1.98 lakh crore, according to an SBI Research Report released on Tuesday.
Under the proposed ‘next-gen GST,‘ items will be taxed under two rates—5% for ‘merit‘ goods and 18% for ‘standard‘ goods. A higher 40% rate will apply to a handful of demerit items such as pan masala and tobacco.
SBI Research noted that the effective weighted average GST rate has already fallen from 14.4% at launch to 11.6% by September 2019. With the upcoming rationalisation, it could decline further to 9.5%.
Despite the revenue hit, the reforms are expected to deliver a 0.6% boost to GDP through higher consumption, without sparking inflation, as mass-use goods will see tax reductions.
Impact on inflation and consumption
The report estimated that CPI inflation may moderate by 20–25 basis points under GST 2.0.
Essential goods such as food and clothing, whose GST rates are expected to decline from 12% to 5%, could reduce inflation in this category by 10–15 basis points, assuming a 60% pass-through to consumers. Rationalisation of service rates is also likely to trim CPI by another 5–10 basis points, with a 25% pass-through effect.
SBI Research stated, “The GST 2.0 regime, while also involving an average revenue loss of Rs 85,000 crore, is estimated to have boosted consumption by Rs 1.98 lakh crore.” For the current fiscal, the revenue shortfall is projected at Rs 45,000 crore if the new rates take effect from October.
Together with income tax cuts announced in the Union Budget, the combined measures are expected to add Rs 5.31 lakh crore in additional consumption expenditure—equivalent to around 1.6% of GDP.
Independent estimates echo these projections. IDFC FIRST Bank, for instance, expects India’s nominal GDP to rise by 0.6% points in the 12 months following the rollout. Since private consumption contributes around 60% of India’s GDP, lower GST on essentials and consumer durables could give demand a decisive lift.
Industry analysts point out that the biggest consumption gains could come from sectors like FMCG, automobiles, household appliances, and health insurance. Prices of air-conditioners, refrigerators, and televisions may fall 7–8% as the GST rate drops from 28% to 18%. HSBC estimates that small cars could become cheaper by up to 8%, while two-wheeler makers would also benefit significantly from lower rates. For an industry that has struggled with affordability in entry-level segments, such reductions could revive volumes during the upcoming festive season.
Insurance is another sector in focus. Health and term insurance premiums, currently taxed at 18%, could see a reduction to 5% or even zero. This would make coverage more affordable for households, though insurers argue that removing input tax credit could actually raise their costs. They have suggested a 12% slab with credit retention as a more balanced solution. Regardless, a rationalised GST is expected to expand access to financial protection over time.
The roadblocks ahead
Despite the optimism, implementation is far from assured due to India’s federal tax structure. Any reform requires approval from the GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and comprising representatives of all states. The Centre holds 33% voting power while the remaining 67% is divided equally among states and Union Territories. All key decisions require a 75% majority, which means at least 20 of the 31 states must agree.
Since GST revenues are shared, changes directly affect state finances. The 18% slab alone contributes nearly 67% of total collections. States heavily dependent on this revenue fear budgetary gaps and reduced capacity to fund public services if rates are slashed without a clear compensation plan. Economists warn that some states may even breach the 3–3.5% fiscal deficit ceiling if GST revenues shrink.
Resistance is also expected from sectors like casinos, lotteries, and online gaming, which currently face high GST rates and contribute sizeable revenues. These industries wield political influence and have historically resisted reforms that would alter their tax treatment.
Moreover, states have diverse economic priorities and political compulsions, making consensus difficult. Even after Council approval, practical challenges remain—resetting rates, updating compliance systems, relabelling inventory, and ensuring public awareness. Retailers and manufacturers would need to quickly reprice goods, while businesses update IT systems for billing and reporting. These transitional issues, though temporary, could complicate the rollout ahead of the Diwali shopping season, which sees peak demand.
Road to a ‘good and simple tax’
The next-generation GST reform promises simplicity and affordability by reducing rate slabs, cutting taxes on mass-consumption goods, and easing compliance. Analysts argue that by resolving long-standing classification disputes—such as differing rates on bakery products, snacks, and packaged foods—the system would also reduce litigation and uncertainty for businesses.
However, its success depends on balancing revenue concerns with reform goals. While the Centre argues that higher consumption will eventually offset near-term losses, state governments remain cautious. Their approval is essential, and consensus will likely require assurances of adequate compensation and possibly a phased transition.
Simply put, the proposed cuts are not yet finalised. They must pass through the GST Council, where states have equal say, and where negotiations will weigh Centre-led ambitions against state fiscal autonomy. Until agreement is reached on revenue protection and implementation logistics, the nationwide rollout of GST 2.0 will remain uncertain.
Read more:
GST reforms 2025: India set for consumer-friendly tax overhaul
